The ongoing global geoengineering assault has long since inflicted catastrophic and irreparable damage to the biosphere, climate, and life support systems of our planet (along with countless other forms of anthropogenic activity). It is truly incomprehensible that such blatantly obvious “climate intervention” programs can be carried out in skies all over the world, in plain site (for over 70 years), and still be officially denied. 3321

Geoengineered skies, Clarksville, Tennessee. Photo credit: Brandy Glick

Though all former US administrations at least publicly pretended to care about the environment (while carrying out business as usual behind the scenes), the Trump administration doesn’t even go that far. The excerpts below were taken from a new UK Guardian article titled “Trump Presidency Opens Door To Planet-Hacking Geoengineering Experiments

Harvard engineers who launched the world’s biggest solar geoengineering research program may get a dangerous boost from Donald Trump, environmental organizations are warning.

Under the Trump administration, enthusiasm appears to be growing for the controversial technology of solar geo-engineering, which aims to spray sulphate particles into the atmosphere to reflect the sun’s radiation back to space and decrease the temperature of Earth.

What is the true agenda of the weather warfare insanity being carried out in our skies? What are the ultimate objectives? Why would the Trump administration enthusiastically embrace, promote, and back geoengineering/climate intervention programs given the fact that Donald Trump and most of his appointees patently deny that there is any global warming in the first place? More excerpts from the Guardian article are below.

While geoengineering received little favour under Obama, high-level officials within the Trump administration have been long-time advocates for planetary-scale manipulation of Earth systems.

David Schnare, an architect of Trump’s Environmental Protection Agency transition, has lobbied the US government and testified to Senate in favour of federal support for geoengineering.

“Clearly parts of the Trump administration are very willing to open the door to reckless schemes like David Keith’s, and may well have quietly given the nod to open-air experiments,” said Silvia Riberio, with technology watchdog ETC Group. “Worryingly, geoengineering may emerge as this administration’s preferred approach to global warming. In their view, building a big beautiful wall of sulphate in the sky could be a perfect excuse to allow uncontrolled fossil fuel extraction. We need to be focussing on radical emissions cuts, not dangerous and unjust technofixes.” 4445 billboard on I-80 near Elko, Nevada (3/20/17). Photo credit: Steve Small

… former House speaker and Trump confidant Newt Gingrich was one of the first to start publicly advocating for geoengineering.

“Geoengineering holds forth the promise of addressing global warming concerns for just a few billion dollars a year,” he said in 2008, before helping launch a geoengineering unit while he ran the right-wing think tank American Economic Enterprise. “We would have an option to address global warming by rewarding scientific innovation. Bring on American ingenuity. Stop the green pig.” 445

Geoengineered skies, Hampstead, North Carolina. Photo credit: Sheen Perkins

US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson has also appeared to support geoengineering, describing climate change as an “engineering problem.” ExxonMobil’s funding of the climate denial industry is under investigation by attorney generals in the United States, but it’s less well known that ExxonMobil scientists under Tillerson’s reign as CEO were leading developers of geo-engineering technologies

Asked about solutions to climate change at an ExxonMobil shareholder meeting in 2015, Tillerson said that a “plan B has always been grounded in our beliefs around the continued evolution of technology and engineered solutions.”

The ongoing atmospheric particulate (SRM) spraying is undeniable as film footage proves.

Geoengineers argue that such methods would be an inexpensive way to reduce global warming, but scientists have warned it could have catastrophic consequences for the Earth’s weather systems.

Scientific modeling has shown that stratospheric spraying could drastically curtail rainfall throughout Asia, Africa and South America, causing severe droughts and threatening food supply for billions of people.

Climate engineering is not a “proposal”, it has long since been a lethal reality. This reality cannot be hidden in plain site for much longer as the cataclysmic consequences from the ongoing climate engineering / weather warfare assault manifest in every conceivable way. All of us are needed and essential in the most critical battle to fully expose the geoengineering insanity. If we can expose it, we can stop it, make your voice heard.

May be freely reprinted, so long as the text is unaltered, all hyperlinks are left intact, and credit for the article is prominently given to and the article’s author with a hyperlink back to the original story.


Sweden is planning to run entirely on renewable energy by 2040 – is there a rational public debate on this subject or just contradictory bipolar spin?

Chaotic Wind Power the Cause of South Australia’s Infamous Blackouts

On the other side of the picture, ecologists are not touching the most powerful arguments against generating electricity by burning coal, because to cite Dr. Marvin Herndon’s findings would turn them into “conspiracy theorists”, i.e. political lepers. Will adults at some point join the mainstream debate on energy?

U.S. Government Spraying Tons Of Toxic Coal Fly Ash Into Atmosphere Via Chemtrails


J Marvin Herndon PhDA paper Published by J. Marvin Herndon on Jan 29, 2017 provides strong evidence of deliberate and toxic climate manipulation involving chemical melting of arctic ice sheets.

“Evidence of an Intentional Effort to Melt Glaciers and Hasten Global Warming”
PRESS RELEASE: SAN DIEGO, February 3, 2017

On or about February 14, 2016, an oily-ashy substance fell on seven residences and vehicles in Harrison Township, Michigan, USA. The Commander of nearby Selfridge Air National Guard Base in Michigan told the press that the release was not from a military plane. Upon being queried as to whether a government agency or contractor plane was involved, Brig. Gen. John D. Slocum did not respond.

Suspecting that this was an accidental release from a covert geoengineering activity, geoscientist J. Marvin Herndon of Transdyne Corporation “obtained samples of the material from one of the residents whose property was splattered from above and had the material analyzed. The material was also sampled and analyzed by officials from the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality.” In a recent article in the Journal of Geography, Environment and Earth Science International, Dr. Herndon reports that “the results of those analyses provide evidence of a deliberate operation to melt ice and snow, which is consistent with the hypothesis that aerosolized coal fly ash is being used to deliberately enhance global warming.” (Complete PR PDF)

“…the preponderance of agreements over a large number of element ratios is strong evidence that coal fly ash is a component of the air-drop material.”

ARTICLE: An Indication of Intentional Efforts to Cause Global Warming and Glacier Melting. J. Marvin Herndon, PhD (Science Domain, International)

ARTICLE (PDF) : “An Indication of Intentional Efforts to Cause Global Warming and Glacier Melting” by J. Marvin Herndon, PhD

The following article was posted on 2/20/2016 a year before Dr. Herndon’s published article.

” data-medium-file=”″ data-large-file=”″ class=”aligncenter size-medium wp-image-13275″ src=”″ alt=”chemtrails-warm-the-climate-marquis.jpg” srcset=” 474w, 948w, 150w, 640w, 768w” sizes=”(max-width: 474px) 100vw, 474px”>Original Post, Feb 20, 2016 by Harold Saive

Note:  Recent posts on this site support the presence of coal fly ash as a geoengineering agent. (1)  Passenger Video Reveals Chemtrails From 747 Turbofan Exhaust  (2)    Florida Climate Engineering Captured by Satellite and Ground Observer  (3)  Coal-Fly-Ash Geoengineering in the Troposphere – Consequences for Public Health.

herndon-splatter-pattern-of-air-drop-material-evidenceThe following story is no surprise to those who’ve been following the covert dumping of aerosols into the atmosphere, including carbon black ash particulates that can increase the melting rate of arctic ice. We can easily imagine the event described in the story is due to mechanical or pilot error when a load of black ash was accidently deployed over the population surrounding Selfridge Air Base.

This report reveals that local officials have no policy in place to adequately respond to a potential terror attack, or to determine if unknown substances falling from the sky onto populations below are a HAZMAT concern.

Sefridge Air Base - Harrison TownshipHarrison Township is a boating community located on Lake St. Clair, immediately south of the only available runway at Selfridge Air Base.

With the dumping of black ash landing on the Harrison population, we can easily guess that Lake St. Clair was probably contaminated with the same pollution with the plausible mission of accelerating ice melt on the lake as a climate engineering objective.

Perhaps not coincidently, Flint Michigan is ground zero for an ongoing water contamination scandal where terrorists could not have done a better job at poisoning the water supply. (Detroit Free Press)

Note: NASA Worldview images for 2/15/2016 shows complete overcast on all satellite views. (NASA)


Mysterious Tar-Like Substance Coats Homes in Michigan Neighborhood

WXYZ Article – Stevie Borrello – 2/17/2016

A dark, oily substance appeared on cars and homes in Harrison Township, Michigan on Feb. 15, 2016. The fire department stated that the substance was not a fire hazard.

The fire department came by on Tuesday and inspected the scene. “It was an ash type of substance with a little bit on an oily consistency to it,” Harrison Township Fire Department Chief Michael Lopez told ABC News.

It appears to have fallen straight down,” he added, noting that the substance was only found on the roofs of cars and homes, and not splattered across the sides.

This was the first instance of this substance appearing that Lopez could recall.

The fire department did not do any chemical analyses but was able to determine that the substance was not a fire hazard and turned over the situation to the airbase.

Schlutow said he believes the substance might have come from the airbase, as it is only a few miles away. However, in a press release today, the Selfridge Air National Guard Base stated that “there is no indication that the substance in question came from a military aircraft of any type.”

The statement also noted that the airbase has “been in communication with the Michigan Dept. of Environmental Quality, which was sending a representative to the area in question to review the material.”

“As Michigan’s Hometown Air Force, we take being a good neighbor very serious,” said Brig. Gen. John D. Slocum, commander of the 127th Wing and the Selfridge base commander. “We will continue to work with our local and state partner agencies to resolve this question.”

The Department of Environmental Quality did not immediately respond to ABC News’ request for comment.

Related WXYZ News Videos






2-14-2016:  Worldview Terra Satellite reveals lake ice conditions – Click to Zoom (Link)


2-15-2016: Worldview Terra Satellite reveals overcast conditions on day of chemical air-drop and associated electromagnetic cloud manipulation – Click to Zoom (Link)


Dane Wigington // (source)

The public has been trained and conditioned to believe that federal agencies like the EPA exist to watch over them and warn them of any potential dangers. This notion could not be further from the truth. Though there are honest and caring people within these agencies (like the scientist who has drafted the statement below), the institutions as a whole exist to hide threats from the population, not to disclose them. The majority of the public continues to convince themselves that if there was really anything they should be concerned about, someone, somewhere, in some federal public protection agency would tell them. The statement below should be a sobering wake-up call for us all. It is yet another confirmation of all that has been stated above. From global geoengineering, to Fukushima, to toxic fluoridated water and lethal vaccinations, the public health and the health of our biosphere is being decimated. Where are the official warnings from official agencies? The truth continues to be hidden by the government agencies that are tasked with hiding it.

Michael Davis is now a former EPA scientist who is working with in an effort to get the truth out, his full resume is at the bottom of this article. Michael was recently terminated from the EPA for daring to tell the truth about two extremely dire public dangers, the highly toxic fallout from climate engineering, and the willful contamination of the public water supply with industrial waste. I had the pleasure and honor of working with Michael for over a year, he has participated in conference calls directly with the Geoengineering Watch legal team (Legal Alliance to Stop Geoengineering, LASG). Upon being terminated from the EPA, I asked Mr. Davis if he would draft a statement for, that statement is below.

A Statement For From Scientist Michael Davis

My name is Michael Davis, I was employed as an Environmental Engineer for nearly 16 years in the National Pollution Discharge Elimination Systems (NPDES) Programs Branch of the Water Division in Region 5, Chicago of the USEPA. I was terminated as a public servant performing a public service for raising the issues of anthropogenic deposition of aluminum due to atmospheric geoengineering. 11009

Geoengineered skies, Woodland, Michigan. Photo credit: Kacy Blair

In addition, I brought up the industrial hazardous waste byproduct of fluoride known as HFSA (being sold primarily by the phosphate fertilizer and aluminum industries) to drinking water utilities for disposal into the nation’s drinking water systems. This does not include pollutants that are discharged from wastewater reclamation facilities into receiving waters.

The issue regarding anthropogenic deposition of aluminum due to atmospheric geoengineering came up in May 2013 when a colleague in the NPDES Programs Branch sent a general email to everyone regarding “NPDES and Climate Change”. I sent a six (6) bullet point one – sentence response to my colleague. Nearly six (6) weeks later my supervisor (at the time) set up a conference call to inform me that I would be receiving a Letter of Reprimand for making false, malicious and unfounded statements against colleagues, supervisors, management and elected public servants. Furthermore, my then supervisor claimed that my statements damaged the integrity and reputation of the agency.

In April, 2014, my last supervisor assigned me to the Beloit, Wisconsin wastewater reclamation facility DRAFT permit review. I asked the permit writer why fluoride (a poison) was be disposed of in Beloit’s drinking water supply?  She could not provide an explanation.  Approximately two (2) weeks later my supervisor placed a “gag order” on me barring me from having any communication written or verbal with anyone unless he approved ahead of time and was present on all conference calls. It was claimed by my supervisor (and management) that the “gag order” would remain in place to prevent me from making statements that would further damage the  integrity and reputation of the agency.  

Furthermore, my supervisor kept giving me assignments like Beloit, Wisconsin where fluoride, along with other pollutants knowing that I would describe the adverse human, animal health effects along with adverse environmental effects of them in my DRAFT Permit review reports. The adverse human, animal and environmental effects were completely ignored by my supervisor.  This was even more profound when it came to the issue of fluoride as HFSA being deposited into the drinking water system. This is in violation of (1) EPA’s Policy on Scientific Integrity, (2) The Precautionary Principle, (3) 5 U.S.C. §2302(b)(8) and (4) Informed Consent.  My supervisor informed me that the EPA does not regulate fluoride in the drinking water systems under either the Clean Water Act (CWA) or the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA). However, FDA under Health and Human Services (HHS) regulated fluoride in the drinking water systems.

I eventually crafted a general description of the adverse human and animal health effects in an email to my supervisor and upper level management.  Initially was ignored by all of them. I had to send the original descriptive email several times over about a six (6) month period of time before I received a reply from the water division director who just parroted the corporate agenda pertaining to fluoride disposal into the nation’s drinking water systems.


The label in the photo above should be shocking to any that are even slightly awake. Highly toxic industrial waste that is officially labelled as a “drinking water additive”.

In doing my own research into the issue of anthropogenic deposition of aluminum from atmospheric geoengineering (as well as fluoride and other pollutants) in an attempt to determine why there was strong opposition from my supervisor and the EPA in general it this (factual reports on the issues). It is because the EPA wants to continue their cover-up, collusion, and criminality pertaining to pollution and contamination being perpetrated by their puppet masters, the multinational corporations. The EPA (like the FDA, CDC, etc) is a complete sham. Because the “P” in EPA stands for protection of corporate profits and not for protecting human, animal and environmental (or biosphere) health. The EPA like other governmental regulatory agencies are corrupt to the core, completely dysfunctional and have been completely hijacked by the multinational corporations.  

I will not allow any of my ex – supervisors, ex – branch chiefs, ex – divisions directors, ex – EPA acting regional administrator or ex – EPA administrator or other individuals either identified or unidentified to get away contaminating our one and only biosphere (soil, water and air), and causing untold adverse human and animal health effects. 

The threats we collectively face are immense and grave. These existential threats are being hidden from public view by government agencies which are completely controlled by a criminal power structure that operates in the shadows with impunity. Those who serve public protection agencies must find the courage to stand up and speak out as Michael Davis has. Others (in the same agencies), who have committed themselves to being shameless tyrannical order followers, must be exposed and held accountable, legally and morally. The battle before us to fully expose the truth requires our full commitment. Each of us is needed, all can make a difference. All can and must make their voices heard in the fight for the greater good, we are rapidly running out of time. My deepest respect and regard for the courage and concern for the greater good that Michael Davis has shown.

Michael Davis resume is below:


To obtain a engineering position in the water/wastewater/alternative energy sector.


  • Solid training and education in chemical/mechanical engineering both supported by Bachelors and Masters degrees with concentration in thermal sciences relating to kinetics, fluid mechanics, heat transfer, and thermodynamics, as well as combustion, pollution and energy control types of engineering analysis.
  • Knowledge of solar engineering, thermal radiation, air pollution, heat transfer, and advanced engineering mathematics.
  • Research and design experience that has been applied to laboratory testing for fluidized bed, char analysis, ash analysis, and air pollution analysis in the development of pulse combustors.
  • Substantial background in procurement for mechanical design.
  • Excellent problem solver combing a high degree of innovation and follow-through.



Environmental Engineer

  • Performed engineering review of multiple million dollar grant proposals.
  • Performed technical reviews of wastewater treatment plant and pretreatment draft permits.
  • Special assignments.

2000 NORTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY, Mechanical Engineering and Applied Mechanics, Fargo, North Dakota
Laboratory Instructor for Mechanical Systems I (M.E. 455) & II (M.E. 456)                                                                                                                                     

Summer Industrial Fellowship Advanced Gas Turbine Systems Research (AGTSR)

  • Performed an empirical heat conduction analysis on the inner and outer bands of the first stage vane doublets with and without Thermal Barrier Coatings (TBC). 
  • Performed further empirical analysis on different film cooling hole patterns on the inner and outer bands, as well as, the design and manufacturing aspects on introducing these film cooling holes.
  • Continued an extended analysis on hot streak on the second stage vanes and how to suppress this hot streak by introduction of film cooling holes on the transition duct. 
  • Having my analysis interpreted in performance of both turbine and engine found that it was in good agreement with only a slight increase in combustor temperature was needed in order to maintain the performance power of the 501 industrial engine.

Summer Industrial Fellowship Advanced Gas Turbine Systems Research (AGTSR)

  • Performed an empirical heat transfer analysis on the first stage compressor wheel, which was comprised of an exotic material.

1996-1999 UNIVERSITY OF NORTH DAKOTA, Mechanical Engineering Department, Grand Forks, North Dakota
Graduate Teaching Assistant


  • UNIVERSITY OF NORTH DAKOTA, Grand Forks, North Dakota
    Masters in Mechanical Engineering (2000)
    Independent Study: “The Influence of Turbulence Level, Scale, Wake Effects, Surface Roughness, Body Shape and Leading Edge Effects on Stagnation Region Heat Transfer.”
    Master in Chemical Engineering (1995)
    Directed Research Project: “Study of the Use of Intermediate Reboilers and Condensers for Industrial Distillation Systems.”
    Bachelors in Chemical Engineering (1994)
    Senior Design Project: Plant design for methanol synthesis from methane gas for Fluor Daniel, Inc., Irvine, California (Project duration = 12 months).


  • Authored: “Transport Phenomena in Bioprocess System (Sludge)” (Spring 1994).
  • Co-authored: “Design of a Solar Water Heater” (Fall 1994).
  • Project: “Comparison of Plate Radiation Using 3-Node and 7-Node Method” (Fall 1994).


Inducted into Tau Beta Pi Engineering Honor Society
Member, Water Environment Federation (WEF)

May be freely reprinted, so long as the text is unaltered, all hyperlinks are left intact, and credit for the article is prominently given to and the article’s author with a hyperlink back to the original story.​


According to Bill Nye, the science guy:


“Climate Change is a real and serious issue.”


“Earth’s climate has changed throughout history. Most of these slight changes are caused by small variations in the earth’s orbit.”


These small variations in orbit that influence the amount of solar radiation reaching Earth, are known as Milankovitch cycles.


Image result for milankovitch cycles + earth's temperatures


A corresponding variation in temperature of up to 6°C is notslight.”

Glaciation cycles are not by any means, “slight.”

However, because they occur over thousands of years, being glacial, they are also not by any means, abrupt.

Not abrupt like this:


Global Cooling or Global Warming, Which is it?


Other changes, not mentioned by Bill, are the ones caused by variations in the solar cycle length:

Solar cycle length (red) vs Northern Hemisphere temperature (blue) (Stauning 2011).


These correlate well with changes in temperature over much shorter duration than glacial cycles.

Correlate well, that is, until around 1975.


“…but climate change as we know it today is characterized by an abrupt increase in the earth’s temperature. It is estimated to have gotten one point two to one point four degrees Fahrenheit warmer in just the last century. Ten out of the last thirteen years were the warmest on record. Ninety-seven percent of climate scientists agree that this new tendency is not caused by the variations of the earth’s orbit but rather very likely caused by human activities. That means you and me.”


Me and him, and I suppose, you. If everyone is guilty, no one is guilty as the Italians say.


“Modern human activities have increased the release of non-naturally occurring greenhouse gases because we have stepped up our demand for burning fossil fuels. The composition of greenhouse gases traps heat radiated from the Sun. The more heat they trap, the warmer our planet gets and as our planet gets warmer we begin to feel the effects.”


Carbon dioxide as one of the three primary radiation absorbing constituents in the atmosphere (along with water vapour and ozone) has been increasing in concentration since the beginning of the last century. As every schoolchild knows, its effect is to decrease radiative loss to space via the greenhouse effect, and to warm the earth.


Let us look at  Carbon Dioxide levels in the atmosphere versus the temperature increase in degrees Celsius.




There does seem to be a definite upturn in CO2 levels from around 1960 that correlates with the spike in temperatures.


In this video depicting CO2 levels in the atmosphere over 1 year, 2006 we can readily observe that this gas is primarily emitted in the northern hemisphere, as one might expect.






NASA - A Year in the Life of Earth's CO2



This would seem to sit well with the heat signature revealed in this NASA GISS map below showing the trend in temperatures annually (Jan-Dec) from the period 1979 - 2006.


Fig 1: Global map

It is clear that the warming is predominantly a northern hemisphere and particularly Arctic phenomenon.

However, the video only showed us CO2 over 1 year, 2006. Let us now look at how measurements of this gas vary over different latitudes covering the period from 1979 to 2006 as in this video below:






CO2 as a gas, although emitted mostly in the northern hemisphere, is dispersed evenly throughout the globe by the atmospheric circulation within the space of a year. This does not sit well with the heat signature of the planet covering a period of 27 years.

This even spread does not correlate with the uneven distribution of global temperature changes.


If CO2 were solely responsible for the warming we should see:


  • Warming of the Troposphere, the lower part of the atmosphere, and a cooling of the Stratosphere as heat is prevented from reaching this level.


  • Equal warming during the night as during the day.


  • More warming in winter.


  • More warming at the poles than at the equator.


All the points except for the last one are what we have actually observed.


It can hardly be said that both poles are warming more than the equator.

By the methods of observation and exclusion we have established that this thermodynamic footprint points towards something other than CO2 alone.


We know that Arctic surface air temperatures have increased by around 1.5 °C (2.7 °F) since 1976 whilst the Antarctic has increased by 0.35 °C (0.6 °F). That’s a 4-times greater increase in the North pole than the South pole.


What else could account for this uneven pattern?

A potential candidate is Soot.



Scientists have been finding soot, or black carbon as it is technically known, in the Arctic.


Black Carbon



It has been suggested that as much as 45% or more of the warming in the Arctic since 1976 has been due to this black carbon. These particles absorb solar radiation and have a strong warming influence both in the atmosphere and on the surface where they counteract the albedo effect of the ice.





The Dog in the Night-Time


Eyebrows would be raised if it were to be disclosed just how much, during the 70’s, and further back, prominent scientists, government agencies and the banking and industrial oligarchs that owned them, were interested in raising global temperatures by means of such schemes as melting the Arctic ice cap by covering it with black soot or diverting arctic rivers and altering cloud formation in order to ward off a supposed ice age, and of course, profit immeasurably.


In 1975, Newsweek published an article, in which the following was written:


Climatologists are pessimistic that political leaders will take any positive action to compensate for the climatic change, or even to allay its effects. They concede that some of the more spectacular solutions proposed, such as melting the Arctic ice cap by covering it with black soot or diverting arctic rivers, might create problems far greater than those they solve. But the scientists see few signs that government leaders anywhere are even prepared to take the simple measures of stockpiling food or of introducing the variables of climatic uncertainty into economic projections of future food supplies. The longer the planners delay, the more difficult will they find it to cope with climatic change once the results become grim reality. Emphasis mine

1970s Global Cooling Scare


1975, the year before 1976, the date from which, 45% or more of the warming in the Arctic has been estimated to have occurred due to deposition of Black Carbon on the Arctic ice.


Further back, in 1972, a paper was written by Dr William Gray on the use of carbon dust (soot) for the purposes of climate modification.


This would involve ground based generators dispensing black carbon into the boundary layer just above the ice. The particles would absorb both incoming solar radiation and that reflected by the snow and warm the air just above the ice by means of convection.

Weather Modification by Carbon Dust Absorption of Solar Energy

If a deliberate, yet viable and clandestine attempt to melt the warm the Arctic was being made in alignment with Gray’s proposals, then black carbon would have been emplaced by means of ground based generators dispensing the particles in the boundary layer above the ice. The particles would then fall onto the surface. The Arctic ocean, when frozen and during its annual thaw, would also receive this treatment.


Gray studied the carbon dust smoke plumes generated by black carbon plants and petroleum fires and found them to be typical of the type of carbon plume which would be used for weather modification.


Perhaps Gray’s ground based dispensers are in place in the form of flare stacks contributing their carbon dust plumes in the Arctic to a degree around 20 times greater than anywhere else in the world in a region that is 5 times more sensitive.


“So it’s not just a warming climate that’s beating back the ice floes; it’s the soot generated from myriad industrial operations in the region. Of course, as the ice melts, more and more of those industries will set up shop in Alaska, Canada, Greenland, etc, and spew more and more soot onto the embattled ice.”


The burden of black carbon that is contributing to Arctic ice melt is provided by Big Oil.


It is important to emphasize the fact that whilst Black Carbon levels have been increasing south of 71° N, they have been decreasing north of that latitude. This suggests that soot emitted within the Arctic Circle is the prime culprit. Gas flaring, for some reason, seems to contribute from around 42% to 52% of Black Carbon in this region, north of 66° N, more than it does in the rest of the world, where it contributes around 3%.


Having established that black carbon north of 70°N in the Arctic has declined since 1990, we can apply the method of exclusion and rule out long-range transport of black carbon from the former Soviet Union, Europe, North America and east Asia as a factor in the unprecedented warming.

We can also infer that the burden of black carbon south of 70°N is the result of emissions from within the Arctic circle itself.






Counterfeiting Clouds


Going back even further to 1970, we find a paper a written by Wallace Murcray.


On The Possibility Of Weather Modification By Aircraft Contrails


He observed that contrails were becoming more frequent and might have an effect on the underlying heat economy. He even linked this observation to projects for modifying the climate discussed by scientists such as Fletcher in the 60s and speculated that they were already underway.


“The writer himself has seen instances in which a single contrail seemed to grow until it became an overcast covering the whole sky. If the contrail were indeed responsible, which is by no means certain, this would constitute definite proof that contrails are capable of a significant effect on local weather, and even possibly on global climate, if such occurrences are widespread and frequent.

“The possible consequences of this are considerable, in fact, it seems probable that one of the projects for modifying the global climate discussed by Fletcher (1965), namely modification of the cloud cover over the polar basin by cloud seeding, is already underway, although the scale is still more modest than he envisioned.”


If all this sounds familiar, it’s because it is.

Modification of cloud cover by means of aircraft dispensing aerosols which cause artificial cirrus clouds to blanket the sky is a topic that more and more people are becoming aware of.

We know what they are referring to.

Those ubiquitous trails that expand and blot out our skies from horizon to horizon.

In this paper written in 1969 by J.O. Fletcher for the Rand Corporation, Fletcher discusses modification of cloud cover over the North Polar Basin by Cloud Seeding. The intent of such an operation is quite clearly for causing a warming to melt the Arctic ice.

Managing Climatic Resources

“It has for example been noted that the creation or dissipation of high cloudiness has an enormous influence on the heat budget of the atmosphere and of the surface. It is estimated that it would take only sixty C-5 aircraft to deliver 1kg per km2 per day over the entire Arctic Basin (10 to the 7 km2). Thus, it is a large but not impossible task to seed such enormous areas.”


Clearly, the use of aircraft to seed clouds, the higher the more effective, as a means to warm the underlying atmosphere and surface was seriously considered at least as far back as 1969.


"Ice free Arctic Ocean

The largest scale enterprise that has been discussed is that of transforming the Arctic into an ice-free ocean. As was noted earlier, this has been carefully studied by the staff of the Main Geophysical Observatory in Leningrad. The central question is the stability of the ensuing global climatic regime. This question cannot be adequately evaluated until global climate simulation models are better developed and suitable simulations performed.

There is also a certain amount of uncertainty in regard to the engineering feasibility of removing the Arctic pack ice. It is possible that the capacity of the present technology may be sufficient to accomplish this task, but this has not been established.

Three basic approaches have been proposed ( Fletcher, 1965): (1) influencing the surface reflectivity of the ice to cause more absorption of solar heat; (2) large-scale modification of Arctic cloud conditions by seeding; (3) increasing the inflow of warm Atlantic water into the Arctic Ocean."


We have observed the increase in cloud cover over the Arctic and its consequent warming impact.

“Overall, relationships between ice, temperature, and clouds indicate that cloud changes in recent decades may enhance the warming of the Arctic and may be acting to accelerate the decline of Arctic sea ice. Emphasis mine

Interannual Variations of Arctic Cloud Types in Relation to Sea Ice

spatial distribution of trend in cloud cover

Spatial distribution of trends in cloud cover over twenty years. Provided by Axel J. Schweiger.

Looking at the change in Arctic cloud cover in spring, we can see that there has been a roughly 10% increase from the period 1980 (73%) to 2005 (83%). This linear change has overridden the effects of the Arctic oscillation.


Time series of seasonally averaged cloud fraction

Time series of seasonally averaged cloud fraction over the arctic seas in spring (March, April, May). Provided by Axel J. Schweiger.


In the regions 60°N to 60°S there has been an increase in global cirrus cloud coverage and a decrease in global cumulus cloud coverage to correlate with the unprecedented global warming we have experienced since the mid-seventies.


The High Resolution Infrared Radiometer Sounder (HIRS) polar orbiting satellite data as reported by Wylie et al (1994) and Wylie and Menzel (1999) found that in the region 60°N to 60°S, over the period from 1985 to 2001, the high clouds, which have an overall warming effect, had increased globally by 1.95% on average, per decade whilst the lower, with an overall cooling influence, had decreased by 1.7% per decade.

Trends in Global Cloud Cover in Two Decades of HIRS Observations