The Covid-19 “Experimental” mRNA Vaccine. Are You Being Told the Truth?

Source: globalresearch.ca

Terminate the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) and Complete Phase 3 Trials

The American people are not being told the truth about Covid, masks, social distancing, lockdowns, mortality or vaccines. In fact, the only thing of which we can be 100 percent certain, is that the government, the public health officials and the media have been lying relentlessly and remorselessly on virtually every topic for the better part of the last year. As far as I can see, lying has become the official state policy. Am I wrong?

For example, we are now being told that the sudden uptick in deaths in various parts the country, are the sign of a “4th Wave”. Naturally, these fatalities are being blamed on the “variant” which is the current ‘hobgoblin du jour.’ What the media and the pundits fail to mention is that the unexpected rise in cases and deaths is only taking place in areas that are engaged in mass vaccination campaigns, a fact that can be easily extrapolated from the chart below.

I don’t know why this is happening, and I certainly don’t think the drug companies have laced their injections with Covid-19. But it certainly deserves to be investigated, don’t you think? And the people deserve to know what’s going on instead of being hoodwinked with some far-fetched fiction about a respiratory infection that persists into the summer months. That’s not what’s happening at all. Here’s how talk show host and author, Steve Deace, summed it up in an article at The Epoch Times:

“The two main objectives of our health care system—informed consent and second opinions—were denied to us at COVID… If the average American knew that almost half of the deaths in America with COVID occurred in nursing homes where less than one percent of Americans live, we would have never ever gone along with this level of subjugation. These are the sorts of data points that have been kept from the American people, so they have not been given the right to informed consent.” (“Steve Deace on ‘Faucian Bargain’: Second Opinions About COVID-19 Denied to Americans” The Epoch Times)

What we need to know now, is whether the Covid vaccines are safe or not? It’s a simple question, but getting answers is like pulling teeth. As everyone knows, any information that doesn’t support the ‘pro-vaccine agenda’ is scrapped by the media and promptly removed from both FB and Twitter. How does that serve the public interest? How is “informed consent” possible without a thorough airing of contrary views in public forums and the media?

It’s not possible, and that seems to be the point. The managers of this campaign seem to prefer brainwashing and mass coercion over dialogue and debate. And their method appears to be working too. Just look at the way that pregnant women and children are being lured into vaccinations that pose significant risks to their health but provide no tangible benefit. The people in these age groups have a better chance of being struck by lightning than killed by Covid, so why take the risk? Why roll the dice on dizziness, nausea, migraines, Bell’s Palsy, myocarditis, blood clots or death, when there’s nothing to be gained? Check out this article in the UK Daily Mail titled “Pregnant women should be fast-tracked for Covid vaccines”:

“Pregnant women should be fast-tracked for Covid jabs because the disease greatly increases the risk of health problems for mums-to-be, a leading medic has said. A study led by a top Oxford expert found that the virus raises the risk of serious maternal complications by more than 50 per cent, including a fivefold risk of mothers needing intensive care.

It doubles the risk of premature birth and newborn illness and also significantly raises the chance of the mother dying, according to a study of more than 2,000 expectant women…..

Covid in a pregnant woman increases complications that can lead to premature birth, which is the number one contributor to newborn death and long-term disability.’” (Pregnant women should be fast-tracked for Covid vaccines because the virus greatly increases their risk of health problems, leading expert says in surprise U-turn”, Daily Mail)

Is this true? Are pregnant mothers better off getting vaccinated? Dr. Joseph Mercola doesn’t think so. Here’s what he said:

“By injecting pregnant women with novel COVID-19 mRNA gene technologies, the medical establishment has thrown away one of the most fundamental safety edicts of medicine, which is that you do not experiment on pregnant women.

None of the COVID-19 vaccines on the market are licensed. They’ve only received emergency use authorization, as basic efficacy and safety studies are still ongoing. Yet pregnant women are urged to get vaccinated, and are lining up to get the shot

This experimentation is doubly unforgivable seeing how women of childbearing age have virtually no risk of dying from COVID-19, their fatality risk being a mere 0.01%.

…it’s important to realize that this is a time during which experimentation can be the most hazardous of all, as you’re not only dealing with potential repercussions for the mother but also for the child. Any number of things can go wrong when you introduce drugs, chemicals or foreign substances during fetal development…

On the whole, injecting pregnant women with novel gene therapy technology that can trigger systemic inflammation, cardiac effects and bleeding disorders (among other things)…”
(“Pregnant Women Should Not Get a COVID Vaccine“, Mercola.com)

While I agree with Mercola in principle, the clinical trials are ongoing so we really don’t have sufficient data to make the determination one way or the other. That’s the problem of putting a vaccine into service before long-term Phase 3 clinical trials are concluded; you’re essentially “Flying blind.” The regulatory agencies seem to be ‘okay’ with that situation, but for pregnant women, it should be a matter of gravest concern especially when you read posts like this on author, Alex Berenson’s Twitter account:

Reports of medium- and-late-term pregnancy crises after the mRNA vaccines keep arriving in VAERS. Including case 1168104-1, a 38-year-old Virginia woman who suffered an apparent case of disseminated intravascular coagulation 16 days after vaccination. She and her fetus both died.

Yes, the fatalities are rare, but there is a common thread, isn’t there? Once again, we’re talking about a “clotting disorder” that could be triggered by– you guessed it– the Covid vaccine. And that is the central theme of this article, the vascular problems that one might experience after getting vaccinated. The connections of course are not always clear, but we suspect that scientists will eventually connect the dots. Consider, for a minute, this disturbing piece titled: “Thousands of reports of menstrual irregularities, reproductive dysfunction following COVID vaccines”. Here’s an excerpt from the piece:

“Thousands of women around the world are reporting disrupted menstrual cycles after receiving injections of COVID-19 vaccines. The U.K.’s government vaccine adverse event system has collected more 2,200 reports of reproductive disorders after coronavirus injections, including excessive or absent menstrual bleeding, delayed menstruation, vaginal hemorrhaging, miscarriages, and stillbirths.

In the U.K., the Yellow Card adverse event reporting system includes 2,233 reports of “reproductive and breast disorders” after reception of AstraZeneca and Pfizer vaccines.

The U.K. Yellow Card program reports 1,465 reactions involving reproductive systems as well as 19 “spontaneous abortions” (miscarriages), five premature labors, and two stillbirths in association with the AstraZeneca vaccine as of April 5. (Note–according to the CDC’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) “462 pregnant women reported adverse events related to COVID vaccines, including 132 reports of misscarriage or premature birth.”)

The reports include:

255 cases of abnormal uterine bleeding

175 cases of heavy menstrual bleeding

165 cases of vaginal hemorrhaging

55 reports of genital swelling, lesions, rashes or ulcerations

19 cases of postmenopausal hemorrhaging

The U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) documents similar reproductive complications.” (“Thousands of reports of menstrual irregularities, reproductive dysfunction following COVID vaccines”, Lifesite News)

There was another article on this same topic in The Chicago Tribune just this week. Here’s an excerpt:

“Some people are reporting abnormal periods after a COVID-19 vaccine. U. of I. professor is looking for answers…. Clancy outlined her personal menstruation experience in a February tweet, after receiving her first dose of the Moderna vaccine. Hundreds of women and people who menstruate replied in the comments with their own experiences.

One Twitter user wrote, “I haven’t had a period in years and I’m about 3 weeks out of my second shot and I’m gushing blood I freaked out but now I see I’m not the only one. This is crazy.”

Another responded, “Two weeks exactly after shot number 2, my cycle started 12 days earlier and heavier than it’s been for the last three years.”

“I ended up finding a lot of people with similar experiences,” Clancy said…. “If you are a post-menopausal person who has experienced bleeding, you should really talk to your doctor,” Clancy said. “And if you have any significant or concerning symptoms alongside your changes to your menstrual cycle, you should also see a doctor.”…

The survey is a joint effort between Clancy and Katharine Lee, a postdoctoral research scholar at Washington University School of Medicine. As of Monday, Lee said more than 25,000 people have filled it out.” (“Some people are reporting abnormal periods after a COVID-19 vaccine. U. of I. professor is looking for answers“, Chicago Tribune)

Why is this happening? Why are so many women reporting “delayed menstruation”, “heavy vaginal bleeding” and miscarriages? Is there a link between the unusual menstrual bleeding and the clotting issues? Why didn’t any of these conditions show up in the clinical trials which were praised for their thoroughness? What does it all mean?

We don’t know, do we, because the Phase 3 trials are ongoing and we don’t have the results yet. But we do know that the CDC advisory board thinks these issues are trivial enough to ignore and to allow the failing vaccines to be put back into service. We know that for certain. Here’s the story:

“The CDC’s independent advisory panel Friday voted 10 – 4 to recommend the continued use of the Johnson & Johnson vaccine after the single-dose shot was paused over blood clotting concerns. The panel did not recommend adding any extra warning about the risk of rare blood clotting disorders.” (Children’s Health Defense)

No “extra warning” about blood clots? Really?

People died, isn’t that worth mentioning to the people who are weighing the risks-benefits of getting vaccinated?

And how rare are these blood clots? According to the media they are “rare, rare and REALLY RARE.” But, are they? According to an article in The Atlantic:

“Last Friday, (Andreas) Greinacher and his team published a paper on their findings in the New England Journal of Medicine. In a press briefing, he said they’d analyzed blood from several dozen people who had experienced blood abnormalities after exposure to the AstraZeneca vaccine, and that every single person tested positive for antibodies against platelet factor 4, and against platelet factor 4 joined with another molecule.

On the same day, a separate group in Norway published similar findings from five patients there who had received the AstraZeneca vaccine. Then, in a meeting this week of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, which helps the CDC make vaccine recommendations, it was reported that five of the six American patients who developed this same blood condition after receiving the Johnson & Johnson shot had been tested for antibodies to platelet factor 4—and all were positive. “It is, in my opinion, absolutely clear that there’s a causal relationship” between the presence of these antibodies and the abnormal clotting, Greinacher had said at last Friday’s briefing. “There’s no doubt about this.” (“The Blood-Clot Problem Is Multiplying”,The Atlantic)

So, while it’s easy to dismiss the clotting deaths as “just a handful of people”, the reality is that a much larger number of people have been impacted, which means that something in the vaccine is triggering vascular problems that remain undiagnosed but could cause serious complications in the future. We don’t know for sure, because the long-term trials were never completed. So, it’s all a big crapshoot.

“So, why are they doing this?. Why are they rushing this vaccine back into service when the clotting fatalities might just be the tip of the iceberg”? Doesn’t that strike you as a bit reckless?

If I’d been vaccinated, I’d be mighty worried right now. The regulators, the government, the public health officials and the media, are all being extremely cavalier about people’s safety while–at the same time– they are vastly expanding their list of potential candidates. Did you notice that they’ve started Covid vaccine trials on children? Keep in mind, that children are at no risk of death if they contract Covid, but can experience severe adverse side effects from the vaccine. Simply put: The risks far outweigh the benefits. This is from the Daily Mail:

“‘Core planning’ documents have been leaked showing schoolchildren will be given one dose when they go back to class after the summer…A source told the Sun: ‘Plans are in place to vaccinate children aged 12 upwards, and senior government officials have been briefed...

Health officials are also said to be looking into jabbing children as young as five from July in a ‘worst case scenario’.” (“Children as young as 12 ‘will get Covid vaccines in September”, Daily Mail)

This is utter insanity and, yet, the same scenario is unfolding in the United States. Here’s the story from the San Jose Mercury:

“Last month, Pfizer announced that its vaccine was safe and effective in adolescents as young as 12. So the vaccine is now being tested in much younger children.

Pfizer’s nationwide trial of 144 children will unfold in phases. It is testing three different doses — 10, 20 and 30 micrograms — in bundles of three different age groups: children ages 5 through 11; ages 2 to 5, and ages 6 months to 2 years. After safety and dosage studies, research will expand into more children and seek signs of efficacy.

Pfizer has already requested an amendment from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration of its Emergency Use Authorization to expand the use of its vaccine to adolescents 12 to 15 years of age, about 2.5 million Californians.” (“Stanford begins testing Pfizer vaccine in babies and young children”, Mercury News)

This goes way beyond “unethical”, and medical professionals have admitted as much. Here’s what Professor Sucharit Bhakdi, M.D said on the matter:

“You are endangered when you take the vaccine. Your family is endangered when they take the vaccine. Your children are going to be endangered (if they take the vaccine.). I am horrified that children are now being vaccinated in clinical trials. This is criminal. I hope you realize that this is criminal, that you are endangering your own children. How can you do this?” (“Perspectives on the Pandemic– “Blood Clots and Beyond”, You Tube)

There’s no reason to vaccinate children for Covid-19. It is entirely unnecessary and deeply suspicious. Why are they doing this? What is their objective?

Here’s how the former Vice President of Respiratory Research for Pfizer, Mike Yeadon, summed it up. He said:

“Can you think of a benign explanation for why you would want to give an experimental-use, gene-based vaccine to tens of millions of people who will not die if they contract this virus? And, I say “no” you can’t, can you? And if you can’t think of a benign explanation then can you think of a malign explanation?”

Great question, but what’s the answer?

I don’t know, but I find it extremely unnerving.

Clearly, a great many people feel that the vaccine has given them their lives back. They can see their friends again, go out to dinner and hug their grandchildren. Unfortunately, the substance they have injected into their arms has already spread to their bloodstreams where it is trapped and gathering in the tissue surrounding the blood vessels. This is no small matter because this genetic material is “biologically active” and can potentially change the body’s immune response. This is the immune response that has preserved the species from the beginning of our collective existence on earth. These gene-based vaccines can alter that response, in fact, that was the intention. The scientists who created these vaccines did not want to simply insert live or dead virus into the body like a traditional vaccine does. They wanted to teach the cells “what to do”, thus, changing the immune system into a vaccine factory. The downside risk, of course, is that this tweaking will confuse the immune system causing it to attack vital organs in the body. That’s commonly referred to as an autoimmune disease “which is a condition in which your immune system mistakenly attacks your body. The immune system normally guards against germs like bacteria and viruses. When it senses these foreign invaders, it sends out an army of fighter cells to attack them.” Robert F Kennedy Jr. had this to say on the topic:

“What we know about coronavirus from 30 years of experience is that a coronavirus vaccine has a unique peculiarity, which is any attempt at making the vaccine has resulted in the creation of a class of antibodies that actually make vaccinated people sicker when they ultimately suffer exposure to the wild virus.” Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

Could this happen? Could this new regime of vaccines create an immune system that is so hyper-vigilant that it wages a war against its own body?

Indeed, it could, in fact, this condition already has a name. It is called Antibody Dependent Enhancement (ADE) which means that your immune system has been “primed” to unleash its defensive arsenal against its own organs, blood vessels etc. We expect that ADE will become a household name in the years ahead as medical problems linked to this misguided mass vaccination campaign begin to pile up and the public outcry touches off a political firestorm. (Maybe then we’ll see some accountability, but don’t hold your breath.)

As for what happens next, well, we can’t say for sure but an “Open Letter” sent to the European Medicines Agency (EMA) by a number of doctors and scientists, points us in the right direction. Here’s part of what they said:

Dear Sirs/Mesdames,

“As physicians and scientists, we are supportive in principle of the use of new medical interventions which are appropriately developed and deployed, having obtained informed consent from the patient. This stance encompasses vaccines in the same way as therapeutics….

(but) we are concerned that there has been and there continues to be inadequate scrutiny of the possible causes of illness or death under these circumstances, and especially so in the absence of post-mortems examinations.”….

The letter then veers into the “meat and potatoes” of their complaint: Safety. Are the vaccines safe or not. Here’s what they say:

“Following intramuscular injection, it must be expected that the gene-based vaccines will reach the bloodstream and disseminate throughout the body…”

This is a critical point: The vaccine might be injected into a muscle in the arm, but it eventually gets into the bloodstream where it is “entrapped in circulation” and spread throughout the body including the brain. It is then taken up by the layer of cells (endothelial cells) that coat the blood vessels. Where the blood-flow is slower– like in the abdomen– more of the vaccine substance is taken up. This could be a very big problem in the future, but there’s no indication that the vaccine manufactures even thought about it. Here’s what happens next:

“…. during expression of the vaccines’ nucleic acids, peptides derived from the spike protein will be presented via the … pathway at the luminal surface of the cells. Many healthy individuals have …lymphocytes that recognize such peptides, which may be due to prior COVID infection, but also to cross-reactions with other types of Coronavirus…. these lymphocytes will mount an attack on the respective cells….It must be expected that endothelial damage with subsequent triggering of blood coagulation via platelet activation will ensue at countless sites throughout the body.”

So now your lymphocytes– which are the white blood cells that help to fight infectious diseases— are attacking the cells that are thought to be foreign invaders. (Sounds alot like ADE, doesn’t it?) This, in turn, leads to damage to the blood vessels and organs or the creation of blood clots which result in stroke, heart attack or other serious medical conditions. Here’s more:

“… this will lead to a drop in platelet counts, (Platelets are the smallest of our blood cells that are literally shaped like small plates) appearance of D-dimers in the blood, and to myriad ischaemic lesions ( ischaemia is a restriction in blood supply to tissues…..Ischemia is generally caused by problems with blood vessels, with resultant damage to or dysfunction of tissue) throughout the body including in the brain, spinal cord and heart. Bleeding disorders might occur in the wake of this novel type of DIC-syndrome including, amongst other possibilities, profuse bleedings and haemorrhagic stroke.”

Okay, so none of this is good, right? You don’t want blood-clots, you don’t want to have a stroke and you sure don’t want to die. So, why is this the first time you’ve read about this? This isn’t fiction and I’m sure as hell not making it up. These conditions have happened and will happen in the future as long as this gene-based gunk remains “entrapped in circulation” in a closed system wreaking “endothelial damage” (Endothelium is a single layer of squamous endothelial cells that line the interior surface of blood vessels, and lymphatic vessels)and forming blood clots. This is going to be the new reality for alot of people who took these experimental vaccines thinking they were fighting a deadly virus. Here’s more:

“The SARS-CoV-2 spike protein binds to the ACE2 receptor on platelets, which results in their activation. Thrombocytopenia has been reported in severe cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Thrombocytopenia has also been reported in vaccinated individuals. We request evidence that the potential danger of platelet activation that would also lead to disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) was excluded with all three vaccines prior to their approval for use in humans by the EMA.”

What does that mean in plain English?

Well, Thrombocytopenia is a condition in which you have a low blood platelet count. Platelets (thrombocytes) are blood cells that help blood to clot. Platelets stop bleeding by clumping and forming plugs in blood vessel injuries. The term “disseminated intravascular coagulation” is the same as saying ‘widespread blood-clotting in the circulatory system’. In other words, the scientists want assurances that the vaccines were tested to prevent the kind of fatalities we’ve already seen with various vaccines that are still in service today. Here’s more:

“Should all such evidence not be available, we demand that approval for use of the gene-based vaccines be withdrawn until all the above issues have been properly addressed by the exercise of due diligence by the EMA. (The European Medicines Agency) There are serious concerns, including but not confined to those outlined above, that the approval of the COVID-19 vaccines by the EMA was premature and reckless, and that the administration of the vaccines constituted and still does constitute “human experimentation”, which was and still is in violation of the Nuremberg Code.” (“Urgent Open Letter from Doctors and Scientists to the European Medicines Agency regarding COVID-19 Vaccine Safety Concerns”,Doctors for Covid Ethics)

Keep in mind, this letter was posted weeks before the first blood clotting event took place, which means the problem could have been anticipated by anyone who understood the science. Even so, the EMA breezily ignored the letter and has done everything in its power to downplay the fatalities.

What are we to make of this? How can we trust our regulatory agencies when they cynically brush aside the legitimate concerns of respected professionals? And when have medical professionals ever put their names and reputations on the line to oppose the distribution of a vaccine?

Never. It’s never happened before, but growing numbers of professionals are stepping forward now because they think the consequences from allowing this campaign to continue unopposed, are just too horrific to ignore. 84 million Americans have now been fully inoculated. Imagine if–in two- or three-years’ time– the longer-incubating diseases emerge with a bang, that is, imagine if we’re hit with a tidal wave of vascular, heart and neuro degenerative diseases unlike anything we have ever experienced before. Imagine how that will impact our threadbare public health system leaving millions to fend for themselves.

And what if our efforts to defeat Covid have actually made matters worse? Here’s another clip from Berenson’s Twitter site:

“A reader points to a VERY worrisome finding in the @cdcgov Chicago nursing home report: patients L19, a 49-year-old staffer, and M20, a 77-year-old resident – both had very low PCR threshold counts (the nurse’s was under 17) and NO symptoms. Why does this matter?

Lower PCR counts mean a person has a heavier viral load – and is thus both more likely to be very sick and more infectious…. These two should have been extremely symptomatic. Instead, the vaccine seems to have protected them from feeling sick – but not from being thoroughly infected and potentially spreading the virus. THIS IS EVIDENCE FOR A POSSIBLE MAREK’S DISEASE OUTCOME, where vaccinated people spread the virus aggressively to the unvaccinated.” Alex Berenson

An article on PBS explains Marek’s Disease. Here’s an excerpt:

“The deadliest strains of viruses often take care of themselves — they flare up and then die out. This is because they are so good at destroying cells and causing illness that they ultimately kill their host before they have time to spread. But a chicken virus that represents one of the deadliest germs in history breaks from this conventional wisdom, thanks to an inadvertent effect from a vaccine. Chickens vaccinated against Marek’s disease rarely get sick. But the vaccine does not prevent them from spreading Marek’s to unvaccinated birds. “With the hottest strains, every unvaccinated bird dies within 10 days. …

In fact, rather than stop fowl from spreading the virus, the vaccine allows the disease to spread faster and longer than it normally would, a new study finds. The scientists now believe that this vaccine has helped this chicken virus become uniquely virulent….over the last half century, symptoms for Marek’s worsened. Paralysis was more permanent; brains more quickly turned to mush….

vaccination extended the lifespan of birds exposed to the hottest strains, with 80 percent living longer than two months. But the vaccinated chickens were transmitting the virus, shedding 10,000 times more virus than an unvaccinated bird.

“Previously, a hot strain was so nasty, it wiped itself out. Now, you keep its host alive with a vaccine, then it can transmit and spread in the world,” Read said. “So, it’s got an evolutionary future, which it didn’t have before.” (“This chicken vaccine makes its virus more dangerous”, PBS)

Are the vaccines allowing sick people –who are carrying a heavy viral load and shedding like crazy– to get on like they are not sick?

Nobody knows, just like no one seems to understand the correlation between mass vaccination and the short-term uptick in fatalities. (See Here)

On so many critical questions, we have no answers and, yet, the response of the public health czars, like Dr Fauci, seems to be that we should simply stop thinking altogether, roll up our sleeves and take the jab. But what if he’s wrong? What if we are paving the way for a disaster the likes of which were outlined by pediatric rheumatologist, Dr. J. Patrick Whelan, who said the following in a letter to the FDA:

“I am concerned about the possibility that the new vaccines aimed at creating immunity against the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein have the potential to cause microvascular injury to the brain, heart, liver and kidneys in a way that does not currently appear to be assessed in safety trials of these potential drugs….

“Before any of these vaccines are approved for widespread use in humans, it is important to assess in vaccinated subjects the effects of vaccination on the heart. As important as it is to quickly arrest the spread of the virus by immunizing the population, it would be vastly worse if hundreds of millions of people were to suffer long-lasting or even permanent damage to their brain or heart microvasculature as a result of failing to appreciate in the short-term an unintended effect of full-length spike protein-based vaccines on these other organs.” (“Scientists Challenge Health Officials on Vaccinating People Who Already Had COVID”, Global Research)

Whelan’s logic is unassailable, and he is joined by so many others all of who are saying the same thing: ‘The virus is showing signs of easing, so take your foot off the gas and let’s complete the vaccine trials before rushing ahead.’ Isn’t that the more rational approach? Here’s more:

“In his public submission, Whelan sought to alert the FDA about the potential for vaccines … spike protein to cause injuries.

Specifically, Whelan was concerned that the new mRNA vaccine technology utilized by Pfizer and Moderna has “the potential to cause microvascular injury (inflammation and small blood clots called microthrombi) to the brain, heart, liver and kidneys in ways that were not assessed in the safety trials.”(“Could Spike Protein in Moderna, Pfizer Vaccines Cause Blood Clots, Brain Inflammation and Heart Attacks?“, Global Research)

Once again, the same menacing buzzwords continue to pop up: “microvascular injury”, “blood-clots” and “spike protein-based vaccines”. Forget about the messenger RNA, that dissipates quickly. The central problem is the spike protein’s effect on the vascular and immune systems. That’s what we need to worry about.

The gene-based vaccines release a spike protein that spreads throughout the body, gets trapped in the bloodstream and collects in the layer of cells (endothelial cells) that coat the blood vessels.

Then–according to Dr. Hyung Chun, a Yale cardiologist– the cells “release inflammatory cytokines that further exacerbate the body’s inflammatory response and lead to the formation of blood clots. Chun has stated: “The ‘inflamed’ endothelium likely contributes not only to worsening outcome in COVID-19, but also is considered to be an important factor contributing to risk of heart attacks and strokes.”

This seems to suggest that the spike protein from the vaccine can have the same effect as the spike protein from the infection. Here’s more:

“Individuals with COVID-19 experience a vast number of neurological symptoms, such as headaches, ataxia, impaired consciousness, hallucinations, stroke and cerebral hemorrhage.
But autopsy studies have yet to find clear evidence of destructive viral invasion into patients’ brains, pushing researchers to consider alternative explanations of how SARS-CoV-2 causes neurological symptoms….

If not viral infection, what else could be causing injury to distant organs associated with COVID-19?

The most likely culprit that has been identified is the COVID-19 spike protein released from the outer shell of the virus into circulation. Research cited below has documented that the viral spike protein is able to initiate a cascade of events that triggers damage to distant organs in COVID-19 patients.

Worryingly, several studies have found that the spike proteins alone have the capacity to cause widespread injury throughout the body, without any evidence of virus.

What makes this finding so disturbing is that the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines manufactured by Moderna and Pfizer and currently being administered throughout the U.S. program our cells to manufacture this same coronavirus spike protein as a way to trigger our bodies to produce antibodies to the virus.” (“Could Spike Protein in Moderna, Pfizer Vaccines Cause Blood Clots, Brain Inflammation and Heart Attacks?” Global Research)

Can this possibly be true? In other words, if Covid-19 is a bioweapon –as some have suggested– then the instigators of the plan may have concocted a cure that is so similar to the virus itself, that no forensic investigation will ever conclusively identify the real perpetrators. This goes way beyond “plausible deniability”. In effect, the perpetrators –if there are perpetrators(?)– have wiped the fingerprints off the smoking gun before the crime has even been committed. Could anyone be that clever?

I have no idea, but it doesn’t change the task before us which is to extricate ourselves from this public health nightmare and piece-together what’s left of our fractured society. That starts with terminating the mass vaccination campaign until Phase 3 trials are completed and product safety can be assured. Better to be safe than sorry.

Putin and Orthodoxy

Je suis Marxiste, tendance Groucho

One problem with this analysis (or at least a popularized variant of it) is that the Orthodox Church has a history of collaboration with foreign, and even non-Christian, invaders. This is certainly true of the Ottoman Empire. Putin is not to blame. He had to find an ideology after Marxism, weakened by Stalin and then by May ’68 and its aftermath, revealed its limitations. As an ideology “Orthodoxy” is not good enough. Eurocommunism was a brave attempt to upgrade Marxism, but proved to be too cerebral and intellectual. What is the answer? No serious answer. Perhaps Marxism is OK, but let it be the Marxism of Groucho and Monty Python, with Zeus and the gods of Olympus for dessert. Let it be realized, though, that locking everyone down is synchronized with NATO’s war preparations.


Site: globalresearch.ca

We are up against the so-called policy of containing Russia. This is not about competition, which is a natural thing for international relations. This is about a consistent and quite aggressive policy aimed at disrupting our development, slowing it down, creating problems along the outer perimeter, triggering domestic instability, undermining the values that unite Russian society, and ultimately to weaken Russia and put it under external control, just the way we are witnessing it transpire in some countries in the post-Soviet space. 

Not without a touch of wickedness, Putin added this was no exaggeration: “In fact, you don’t need to be convinced of this as you yourselves know it perfectly well, perhaps even better than anybody else.”

The Kremlin is very much aware “containment” of Russia focuses on its perimeter: Ukraine, Georgia and Central Asia. And the ultimate target remains regime change. 

Putin’s remarks may also be interpreted as an indirect answer to a section of President Biden’s speech at the Munich Security Conference ( Here is an excellent analysis, in Russian). 

According to Biden’s scriptwriters,   

Putin seeks to weaken the European project and the NATO alliance because it is much easier for the Kremlin to intimidate individual countries than to negotiate with the united transatlantic community (…) The Russian authorities want others to think that our system is just as corrupt or even more corrupt.

A clumsy, direct personal attack against the head of state of a major nuclear power does not exactly qualify as sophisticated diplomacy. At least it glaringly shows how trust between Washington and Moscow is now reduced to less than zero. As much as Bidens Deep State handlers refuse to see Putin as a worthy negotiating partner, the Kremlin and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs have already dismissed Washington as non-agreement capable.  

Once again, this is all about sovereignty. The “unfriendly attitude towards Russia”, as Putin defined it, extends to “other independent, sovereign centers of global development.” Read it as mainly China and Iran. All these three sovereign states happen to be categorized as top “threats” by the US National Security Strategy. 

Yet Russia is the real nightmare for the Exceptionalists: Orthodox Christian, thus appealing to swathes of the West; consolidated as major Eurasian power; a military, hypersonic superpower; and boasting unrivalled diplomatic skills, appreciated all across the Global South.  

In contrast, there’s not much left for the Deep State except endlessly demonizing both Russia and China to justify a Western military build-up, the “logic” inbuilt in a new strategic concept named  NATO 2030: United for a New Era.  

The experts behind the concept hailed it as an “implicit” response to French President Emmanuel Macron declaring NATO “brain dead”. 

Well, at least the concept proves Macron was right.  

Those barbarians from the East 

Crucial questions about sovereignty and Russian identity have been a recurrent theme in Moscow these past few weeks. And that brings us to February 17, when Putin met with Duma political leadersfrom the Liberal Democratic Party’s Vladimir Zhirinovsky – enjoying a popularity surge – and the Communist Party’s Gennady Zyuganov to United Russia’s Sergei Mironov, as well as State Duma speaker Vyacheslav Volodin 

Putin stressed the “multi-ethnic and multi-religious” character of Russia, now in “a different environment that is free of ideology”:  

“It is important for all ethnic groups, even the smallest ones, to know that this is their Motherland with no other for them, that they are protected here and are prepared to lay down their lives in order to protect this country. This is in the interests of us all, regardless of ethnicity, including the Russian people.” 

Yet Putin’s most extraordinary remark had to do with Ancient Russian history: 

Barbarians came from the East and destroyed the Christian Orthodox empire. But before the barbarians from the East, as you well know, the crusaders came from the West and weakened this Orthodox Christian empire, and only then were the last blows dealt, and it was conquered. This is what happened…we must remember these historical events and never forget them.

Well, this could be enough material to generate a 1,000-page treatise. As it stands, let’s try at least to – concisely – unpackage it.  

The Great Eurasian Steppe – one of the largest geographical formations on the planet – stretches from the lower Danube all the way to the Yellow River. The running joke across Eurasia is that “Keep Walking” can be performed back to back. For most of recorded history this has been Nomad Central: tribe upon tribe raiding at the margins, or sometimes at the hubs of the Heartland: China, Iran, the  Mediterranean.  

The Scythians (see, for instance, the magisterial The Scythians: Nomad Warriors of the Steppe, by Barry Cunliffe) arrived at the Pontic steppe from beyond the Volga. After the Scythians, it was the turn of the Sarmatians to show up in South Russia. 

From the 4th century onwards, Nomad Eurasia was a vortex of marauding tribes, featuring, among others, the Huns in the 4th and 5th centuries, the Khazars in the 7th century, the Kumans in the 11th century, all the way to the Mongol avalanche in the 13th century.  

The plot line always pitted nomads against peasants. Nomads ruled – and exacted tribute. G. Vernadsky, in his invaluable Ancient Russia, shows how “the Scythian Empire may be described sociologically as a domination of the nomadic horde over neighboring tribes of agriculturists”.  

As part of my multi-pronged research on nomad empires for a future volume, I call them Badass Barbarians on Horseback. The stars of the show include, in Europe, in chronological order, Cimmerians, Scythians, Sarmatians, Huns, Khazars, Hungarians, Peshenegs, Seljuks, Mongols and their Tatar descendants; and in Asia, Hu, Xiongnu, Hephtalites, Turks, Uighurs, Tibetans, Kirghiz, Khitan, Mongols, Turks (again), Uzbeks and Manchu.    

Arguably, since the hegemonic Scythian era (the first protagonists of the Silk Road), most of the peasants in southern and central Russia were Slav. But there were major differences. The Slavs west of Kiev were under the influence of Germania and Rome. East of Kiev, they were influenced by Persian civilization. 

It’s always important to remember that the Vikings were still nomads when they became rulers in Slav lands. Their civilization in fact prevailed over sedentary peasants – even as they absorbed many of their customs.   

Interestingly enough, the gap between steppe nomads and agriculture in proto-Russia was not as steep as between intensive agriculture in China and the interlocked steppe economy in Mongolia. 

(For an engaging Marxist interpretation of nomadism, see A.N. Khazanov’s Nomads and the Outside World).    

The sheltering sky  

What about power? For Turk and Mongol nomads, who came centuries after the Scythians, power emanated from the sky. The Khan ruled by authority of the “Eternal Sky” – as we all see when we delve into the adventures of Genghis and Kublai. By implication, as there is only one sky, the Khan would have to exert universal power. Welcome to the idea of Universal Empire. 

In Persia, things were slightly more complex. The Persian Empire   was all about Sun worship: that became the conceptual basis for the divine right of the King of Kings. The implications were immense, as the King now became sacred. This model influenced Byzantium – which after all was always interacting with Persia. 

Christianity made the Kingdom of Heaven more important than ruling over the temporal domain. Still, the idea of Universal Empire persisted, incarnated in the concept of Pantocrator: it was the Christ who ultimately ruled, and his deputy on earth was the Emperor. But Byzantium remained a very special case: the Emperor could never be an equal to God. After all, he was human. 

Putin is certainly very much aware that the Russian case is extremely complex. Russia essentially is on the margins of three civilizations. It’s part of Europe – reasons including everything from the ethnic origin of Slavs to achievements in history, music and literature. 

Russia is also part of Byzantium from a religious and artistic angle (but not part of the subsequent Ottoman empire, with which it was in military competition). And Russia was influenced by Islam coming from Persia.

Then there’s the crucial nomad influence. A serious case can be made that they have been scholarly neglected. The Mongol rule for a century and a half of course is part of the official historiography – but perhaps not given its due importance. And the nomads in southern and central Russia two millennia ago were never properly acknowledged. 

So Putin may have hit a nerve. What he said points to the idealization of a later period of Russian history from the late 9th to early 13th century: Kievan Rus. In Russia, 19th century Romanticism and 20th century nationalism actively built an idealized national identity. 

The interpretation of Kievan Rus poses tremendous problems – that’s something I eagerly discussed in St. Petersburg a few years ago. There are rare literary sources – and they concentrate mostly on the 12th century afterwards. The earlier sources are foreigners, mostly Persians and Arabs.  

Russian conversion to Christianity and its concomitant superb architecture have been interpreted as evidence of a high cultural standard. In a nutshell, scholars ended up using Western Europe as the model for the reconstruction of Kievan Rus civilization. 

It was never so simple. A good example is the discrepancy between Novgorod and Kiev. Novgorod was closer to the Baltic than the Black Sea, and had closer interaction with Scandinavia and the Hanseatic towns. Compare it to Kiev, which was closer to steppe nomads and  Byzantium – not to mention Islam. 

Kievan Rus was a fascinating crossover. Nomadic tribal traditions – on administration, taxes, the justice system – were prevalent. But on religion, they imitated Byzantium. It’s also relevant that until the end of the 12th century, assorted steppe nomads were a constant “threat” to southeast Kievan Rus. 

So as much as Byzantium – and later on even the Ottoman Empire –  supplied models for Russian institutions, the fact is the nomads, starting with the Scythians, influenced the economy, the social system and most of all, the military approach.     

Watch the Khan  

Sima Qian, the master Chinese historian, has shown how the Khan had two “kings”, who each had two generals, and thus in succession, all the way to commanders of a hundred, a thousand and ten thousand men. This is essentially the same system used for a millennia and a half by nomads, from the Scythians to the Mongols, all the way to Tamerlane’s army at the end of the 14th century.    

The Mongol invasions – 1221 and then 1239-1243 – were indeed the major game-changer. As master analyst Sergei Karaganov told me in his office in late 2018, they influenced Russian society for centuries afterwards. 

For over 200 years Russian princes had to visit the Mongol headquarters in the Volga to pay tribute. One scholarly strand has qualified it as “barbarization”; that seems to be Putin’s view. According to it, the incorporation of Mongol values may have “reversed” Russian society to what it was before the first drive to adopt Christianity.    

The inescapable conclusion is that when Muscovy emerged in the late 15th century as the dominant power in Russia, it was essentially the successor of the Mongols. 

And because of that the peasantry – the sedentary population – were not touched by “civilization” (time to re-read Tolstoy?) Nomad Power and values, as strong as they were, survived Mongol rule for centuries. 

Well, if a moral can be derived from our short parable, it’s not exactly a good idea for “civilized” NATO to pick a fight with the – lateral –  heirs of the Great Khan.

*

Note to readers: please click the share buttons above or below. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc.

This article was originally published on Asia Times.

Pepe Escobar, born in Brazil, is a correspondent and editor-at-large at Asia Times and columnist for Consortium News and Strategic Culture in Moscow. Since the mid-1980s he’s lived and worked as a foreign correspondent in London, Paris, Milan, Los Angeles, Singapore, Bangkok. He has extensively covered Pakistan, Afghanistan and Central Asia to China, Iran, Iraq and the wider Middle East. Pepe is the author of Globalistan – How the Globalized World is Dissolving into Liquid War; Red Zone Blues: A Snapshot of Baghdad during the Surge. He was contributing editor to The Empire and The Crescent and Tutto in Vendita in Italy. His last two books are Empire of Chaos and 2030. Pepe is also associated with the Paris-based European Academy of Geopolitics. When not on the road he lives between Paris and Bangkok.

He is a frequent contributor to Global Research.

ASK THE EXPERTS

https://brandnewtube.com/watch/ask-the-experts-covid-19-vaccine-now-banned-on-youtube-and-facebook_qIsNohSIeSgfz2J.html

My name is Andrew Kaufman. I am a medical doctor and certified forensic psychiatrist. This pandemic is not a real medical pandemic. The COVID19 vaccine is not proven safe or effective because there has not been enough time. In addition there has not been any definition of any clear disease for which it can be tested against. There has not been a virus which has been purified or shown to be the cause of an illness. Thus there is no target for a vaccine. However, the bottom line is that since no additional deaths have occurred in relation to a new disease there is simply no need for a new vaccine.

Dr Hilde de Smet: Hi, my name is Hilde de Smet. I’m a Belgian medical doctor and I’d like to say that the new COVID19 vaccine is not safe and that there is no global medical pandemic. For almost twenty years the pharmaceutical industry has been trying to develop corona vaccines but never managed because they saw in the animal trials that there were serious side effects: auto-immune disorders when the animal was exposed to a new wild-type virus. These auto-immune disorders are comparable with the complications we have seen in some COVID19 patients. Now due to the excuse of a global pandemic the pharma industry has the permission to skip the animal trials. This means that we humans will be the guinea pigs and we might get severe side-effects when we are exposed to new viruses.

Nils Fosse: My name is Nils Fosse. I’m a medical doctor in Bergen, Norway. The COVID19 vaccine has not been proven safe and effective. It’s a new technology and it’s been tested on a few thousands of people in a few months. Please do your own research. This is not a real medical pandemic. They death rates in Norway are not higher than in an average year.

Dr. Elizabeth Evans: Dr. Elizabeth Evans, retired doctor and co-founder of the UK Medical Freedom Alliance. The COVID19 vaccines are not proven to be safe or effective. We believe that it is reckless and unnecessary to roll out these essentially experimental vaccines that are using a completely new MRNA technology to millions of people when there is only limited short-term safety data, no evidence that they will prevent transmission of the virus and no long-term safety data to rule out late-onset negative effects like auto-immune diseases, infertility and cancers.

Dr. Mohammed Adil: This is Dr. Mohammed Adil from the United Kingdom. I am a fellow of the Royal College of Surgeons of the UK and consultative surgeon. I have been working for the national health services for the last thirty years with an unblemished record. I am chairman of the Global Nishtarian Organization, All-Pakistan Medical Association UK, and recently we have developed World Doctors Alliance, in collaboration with thousands of health professionals across the world. Recently we had a very successful webinar which had been viewed by millions of people across the world. I am standing for the cause of humanity, especially in the current situation of downstating of fact in the Corona virus and the restriction imposed on the public. Many thanks.

Dr. Vernon Coleman: Doctors aren’t allowed to question COVID19 in public. Material containing the truth about the alleged disease and the vaccine is banned. In the last year I’ve been demonized and lied about and a fifty-year career and reputation trashed by those promoting a pandemic that never was and a vaccine that was never needed. The whole COVID19 scam is, as I said in March 2020, the greatest hoax in history. The principle of informed consent is essential in medicine, but patients now having vaccines can’t give informed consent because they aren’t being informed. Thank heavens for sites such as Brandnewtube, which carry uncensored videos by doctors who have been censored or banned elsewhere.

Dolores Cahill: My name is Professor Dolores Cahill. I’m a molecular biologist and immunologist and we have good news. The Corona virus and lockdown was not as severe as was thought. We know that we can treat the symptoms of COVID19 very successfully with vitamins D, C and zinc and with very safe medicines. So therefore the lockdown and the measures like social distancing, quarantining and masks were not necessary. And also a vaccine is then also not necessary. There has never been a licence or any vaccine and this is not because there have been many clinical trials but that in the safety studies there have been many adverse events and death in the animals that were used in these studies over the past twenty years.

Zac Cox: My name is Zac Cox. I’m a holistic dentist and a homeopath. I’m a founder member of the World Doctors Alliance. I believe that the pandemic is fundamentally over and was so in the summer. I also firmly believe that there is no long-term safety data on any of the COVID vaccines. This means that they are essentially experimenting on us, which is against the Nuremberg Code. I will not be taking the vaccine.

Dr. Anna Forbes: Hello. I’m Dr. Anna Forbes. I’m a UK medical doctor here representing the UK Medical Freedom Alliance. This is a growing body of scientists, academics, doctors and lawyers. We believe that there has been an overestimation of the public health risk from SARS-COP2 due to misrepresentation of data and inappropriate use of the PCR test. We call for the preservation of informed consent, medical choice and bodily autonomy. As doctors we believe this is absolutely crucial to maintain. Thank you.

Dr. Ralf ER Sundberg: I am Ralf Sundberg M.D., Ph.D. former associate professor in transplant surgery at Karolinska Institutet. My opinion of this corona virus crisis is that the PCR test is inaccurate. It actually causes so many false positives. So we are scared to vaccination and I don’t trust this vaccine.

Johan Denis: My name is Dr. Johan Denis from Belgium. The corona vaccine is not proven safe or effective. There is no medical emergency. It is a fake pandemic. The corona virus is in terms of harmfulness, mortality and transmissibility comparable to a seasonal flu and I can only reject the extreme disproportionate measures taken by our governments. There is no emergency situation. It was all orchestrated to make you fearful enough to take the vaccine. This vaccine is just not proven safe. It has been developed too quickly. We have no idea what the long-term effects will be. It needs much more investigation. There is no hurry or emergency. It might possibly change your DNA. This is irreversible and irreparable for all future generations. An experiment on humanity. I would never give it to myself, my patients or my loved ones. We are no guinea pigs.

Dr. Daniel Cullum: Hi. I am Dr. Daniel Cullum, chiropractic physician from Turpin Oklahoma USA. This is not a real medical pandemic the world is enduring at this time. The vaccine has not been proven safe or effective, and I will not be taking and/or recommending it because there is no safe vaccine. Period.

Moritz von der Borch. My name is Moritz von der Borch. I am working as a journalist in science and medicine and I’m from Germany. Do not take this vaccine. This vaccine is dangerous. This pandemic is a fraud.

Dr. Anne Fierlafijn. My name is Anne Fierlafijn. I’m a medical doctor from Belgium, specialized in chronic infectious diseases such as Lyme, Epstein-Barr, Maltz, etc. The COVID19 vaccine is not proven safe nor effective and I think it is unacceptable that all liabilities have been waived for the companies that are producing it. If pharma doesn’t take responsibility for the product they make, how can they expect doctors to inject them to their patients without doubt of doing harm? More and more, we see that this is not a medical pandemic. The measures for Corona cause far more collateral damage than the virus causes itself. World wide we see that the numbers of cases are falsely presented in order to drive the population to obedient behaviour and to vaccination. So please be critical. Do your own research. And don’t let the media manipulate you. I think it’s time to react, time to stand up for your freedom, for the future of your children. Don’t give in to anxiety, to polarization, to governmental control and to restriction of your freedom. All under the false pretext of a virus. Because that’s what’s happening.

Dr. Tom Cowan: Hi, this is Dr. Tom Cowan and I just want to remind people that we have to remember that health does not come from the injection of toxins into our bodies but rather from deciding what it means to be human and pursuing that with all your heart.

Dr. Kevin Corbett: I’m Dr. Kevin Corbett, a retired registered nurse and health scientist in the United Kingdom. The COVID vaccines are not proven safe or effective. COVID is not a real medical epidemic. The vaccines use synthetic products that will alter your genes, allow monitoring of your vaccination status and produce dangerous chemical reactions. Scientists are therefore demanding that all COVID vaccinations be immediately stopped. The real epidemic is fear and hysteria. It started in China and quickly spread via the World Health Organization. The hysteria was accelerated by corporations who gain financially through selling fast-tracked flawed medical tests, toxic anti-viral drugs and now unproven and potentially dangerous vaccines. Standard precautions, which normally protect the public, have been disregarded due to ignorance, hysteria and profits. For example, the vaccines have not undergone proper phase 3 tests. The COVID test, the PCR, is fatally flawed. It was never examined in the standard way by the United Kingdom National Health Service and it should never have been used on sick people or those with no symptoms. You can read about the flaws in the PCR test at www. cormandrostenreview.com.

Dr. Carrie Madej: My name is Dr. Carrie Madej. I am an internal medicine physician from the United States of America. I own my own clinic and I’ve been medical director of two different clinics as well as being an attending physician for medical students over the last nineteen years. I’m here to tell you that there is no world-wide pandemic for COVID19. We’re using testing mechanisms called PCR that have never been indicated or created to diagnose any infection. This is not the way we should be diagnosing. In addition hospitals and doctors are getting financial incentives to diagnose COVID19. On top of that we have multiple lab errors happening around the world over and over, indicating more false positives. On top of that I am here to tell you that I will not take the COVID19 vaccine and I will not recommend the COVID19 vaccine for any of my patients. This vaccine is experimental on the human race, because they are proposing to use modified messenger RNA or modified DNA. synthetic to the human body. This is the first time ever this will ever be launched on the human race. We don’t know what could happen to us. In addition they are proposing to use nano-lipid technology or nanotechnology on the human race as well. There are so many different awful things that can happen to us and we need to investigate this before we go forward. This is my alarm call to the world.

Dr. Barre Lando: My name is Dr. Barre Lando and I’ve treated many vaccine damaged children. Due to the lack of proper testing and the spurious conditions surrounding the alleged pandemic I would highly caution anyone considering taking the COVID19 vaccine.

Kate Shemirani: I am Kate Shemirani, natural nurse in a toxic world. Do I believe there is a pandemic? Absolutely not. There is no evidence of that. Do I believe that COVID19 exists? Absolutely not. It has never been proven. Do I believe that the population need this new COVID19 dangerous vaccine that has not had the safety trials done, and it hasn’t ever been done before? Absolutely not. No-one needs it. Do I believe that our government should be arrested for possibly genocide? Absolutely.

Sandy Lunoe: I am Sandy Lunoe, retired pharmacist and I live in Norway. The COVID19 vaccines are not proven safe or effective. I focus on just two safety issues. The vaccines carry the risk of immune enhancement. Instead of protecting against infection the vaccine can actually make the disease worse when a vaccinated person is infected with the virus. Secondly, in the UK the Medicines and Health Care products Regulatory Agency has made an urgent request: “The MHRA urgently seeks an artificial intelligence software tool to process the expected high volume of COVID19 vaccine adverse drug reactions.”

Boris Dragin: My name is Boris Dragin and I am a licensed acupuncturist based in Sweden. I have been running a private complementary medical clinic for over forty years. This COVID pandemic is not a real pandemic. This is an assault on our human rights, our freedom and our societies. You’d have to be completely mad to accept untested experimental vaccine from a criminal manufacturer that rushes its safety programs and profits enormously from pressuring people to take it. And do you really think that there is an insurance company somewhere in the world that would dare to insure such a vaccine? Let our “leaders” and all other proponents of this toxic mix take it.

Dr. Piotr Rubas: My name is Piotr Rubas. I come from Poland. I work as an intern in Germany. I strongly disagree to getting vaccinated with this experimental preparation called the corona vaccine. Firstly each and every new vaccine has to undergo a period of clinical trials, which is at least five years. Secondly, why should I expose my body to something unknown due to a virus whose mortality rate is similar to that of seasonal influenza virus.

Dr. Natalia Prego Cancelo: The COVID19 vaccine is not proven safe or effective. This is not a real medical pandemic.

Dr. Rashid Buttar: I want you to remember that each one of you, every single one of you, independently, is a beacon of light for those around you. So set the example. Stand up. Continue to fight. Continue to speak out. Especially for your children. Let your children see what it means to be free. Allow your children to witness your heroism and that you are willing to stand up and do what’s right, regardless of what’s going on around you.

Dr. Nour de San: The problem is not the principle of the vaccine. The problem is that they want us to believe that it was possible to develop a new vaccine in less than one year, against a new disease, using new adjuvant technologies and to do so on such a very very large scale. It’s not just the target population that will be vaccinated. They plan to vaccinate nearly every person on earth. Anyone who has worked on vaccinations knows that it requires time, so that we are able to collect enough data to ensure its efficacy and safety, and properly understand the long-term effects on our health.

Dr. Kelly Brogan: For the better part of a century vaccination has relied on corrupt science, propaganda, and systemic suppression of true informed consent. With the COVID vaccine we reach an inflection point where the truth is available for all to see. Will you trust GMO, pharmaceutical and 5G subsidizing eugenicist technocrats with your health? Or will you see through their claims to a transhumanist agenda that aims to dispossess you of trust in your body, of any agency around your own life and even of the fabric of your own humanity. Vaccination is penetration of the body, mind and spirit by the State. The COVID19 vaccine is not proven safe or effective. This is not a real medical pandemic.

Prof. Konstantin Pavlidis: My name is Konstantin Pavlidis and I’m a professor of collective science, a biomedical researcher and an integrated health care practitioner in London. I feel that the COVID19 virus is not a real medical pandemic and for this reason the vaccine that is being produced is not proven safe or effective because there are four stages: the latent asymptomatic stage, the developmental stage where there is a manifestation of symptoms: the virus convinces the T-cells that it’s not an invader and that it hacks into the the immune system, and finally the fourth stage is the decline in the virus’s presence where it is undetectable by any test and it is not present in the body liquids. The viral DNA becomes part of the DNA’s host immune cells. So for this reason no COVID tests are truly accurate. And no produced vaccine could be accurate as it tricks the immune system into reacting as if there is a real viral attack. And this triggers monocytes in the attempt to access the immune memory cells. These actions appear as viral symptoms, for example chronic fatigue, muscular contractions or mental health disorders ranging from depression to suicidal tendencies. And all of these are in fact side-effects of the vaccine’s influence.

Dr. Sherri Tenpenny: Know that when they develop this it’s under the umbrella of the 2005 Prep Act. They have complete liability protection. You can’t sue them and you have no recourse if this vaccine harms you. They have been trying to develop a Corona virus vaccine since 2002, since we had SARS, and every animal study that they’ve done, particularly the ferret study, which the ferret’s immune system most mimics the human adult immune system, ferret studies, rats and rabbit studies, all the animals ended up with a paradoxical immune response in which the antibody levels that were very high actually accelerated the infection, made it much worse, and allowed the pieces of the virus to go inside of the cell and be incorporated into the DNA of the recipient of that vaccine, by a process called transduction. That transduction irreversibly puts that virus, snip of virus, into your DNA and transforms your cells.

Senta Depuydt: Hello, I’m Senta Depuydt. I’m a freelance journalist and I represent Children’s Health Defense in Europe with Robert F. Kennedy junior. We want to alert you to the fact that the current COVID vaccines are an experimental product based on the injection of genetic materials into our cells. And the risk of using these new technologies on humans and the environment are unknown, while they could have irreversible consequences. In April the Pandemic Accelerator Act of the European Union allowed vaccine producers to have a free pass for safety and on July 15 the European Parliament agreed to remove the need of risk evaluation requested under the GMO regulation. That decision was made in ten days. There were no scientific reports, no hearings in health commission, no debate and no amendment prior to this vote. So Children’s Health Defense Europe has asked for the annulment of this decision in the European Court of Justice in Luxembourg. Please share this information as it is extremely important to understand that the current COVID vaccines are not proven safe. All legislators have abandoned the principle of precaution by putting blind faith in a dangerous experiment.

Dr. Heiko Santelmann: My name is Heiko Santelmann. I’m a German medical doctor now working in Norway. I have been working with general practice for forty years, doing research for twenty years, the last ten years especially on vaccines. I have to shout out that this is not a real medical pandemic and the COVID19 vaccine is not proven to be safe or effective. I agree with the British Medical Journal that the testing is not done honestly. The claimed 90% effect us really only a 0.2% if you study the results. I wonder, why did Gates and his conspiracy theorists spend billions to develop vaccines that can sterilize men, women, and even their unborn children.

Dr. Margarita Griesz-Brisson: Uniform enforcement measures, medical measures, are unethical and cannot be implemented on a defenceless population, neither as tests nor as vaccines. Any medical intervention, testing, treatment or vaccine can only be implemented in an ethical and legal way based on an individual medical consideration, well-informed patient consent and clinical evidence of harmlessness beyond doubt. Thank you.

Dr. Mikael Nordfors: My name is Mikael Nordfors. I’m a medical doctor from Sweden and I’m working with integrative medicine. And there is no pandemic. And the vaccine is neither safe nor effective. And to give untested vaccine to entire humanity, use them as guinea pigs, is complete madness, and we must stop it. Now. And it’s even more madness to give it to children when children don’t suffer from COVID19. Nobody died under the age of fifty in my country so far. And there is only side-effects and risks. And costs. And that’s a waste of money and a waste of human life. And safety. So stop it now. And I also bet that there will never be a vaccine as safe and effective as vitamin D, that can reduce mortality between fifty and ninety-five percent depending on the level of vitamin D you have in your blood.

Dr. Elke F. De Klerk: Hello, I’m Elke de Klerk, I’m a medical doctor from the Netherlands. I have informed myself about the vaccine and I want to tell you about three things. First of all this vaccine could be sterilizing women and girls, secondly this vaccine could cause a viral interference, a priming and then it can cause a cytokine storm, which is very dangerous for your health, for people. This has been seen in humans and animals, animal testing with other corona virus vaccines. And thirdly this vaccine could change your genetic blueprint, your genetic codes, your DNA forever, and we don’t know what it’s going to bring. Thank you very much. Inform yourself, protect yourself, protect your children and look it up. Thank you.

Ask the experts.

Thank you to every single expert brave enough to speak out.

Special thanks to Fiona Hine.

Special thanks to Covileaks UK.

Special thanks to Dr. Andrew Kaufman M.D.

The views of Arthur Firstenberg on electrical power – a comparative examination

W. Hall

To the best of my knowledge the “Meeting on Energy” is mostly a creation of the ecological milieu generated out of a problematic on renewable energy sources, i.e. solar and wind energy, which had been promoted by ecologists but started to be subjected to criticism not only by supporters of rival technologies but also from within the ecological milieu itself. Internationally known figures such as Michael Moore added their voices to this negative discourse , causing embarrassment to the ecologists and leftists who had dismissed as conspiracy theorists the people embracing the views they now heard being put forward by Michael Moore.

In the first months of 2020 the insistent condemnations of anthropogenic climate change denial by the school pupil Greta Thunberg was suddenly withdrawn to make room for horror over the corona virus COVID19. The quarantines and lockdowns put paid to a myriad of functions. De facto they necessitated a change of orientation. A prerequisite for investigation of the energy issue, or any other issue, was restoration of political normality.

I would like to introduce two analyses of the derailment of the previous normality. The first is focused on deceit, fraud. It is the study entitled “What on earth is going on? , translated from French by Claire Edwards, former United Nations official who was also one of the authors of the “International Appeal: Stop 5G on Earth and in Space“. The original text of “What on Earth is going on” was compiled by a group of French reserve army officers. Here is the English text.

I quote an extract from the study: “5G is a much larger power of electromagnetic energy than what we have seen before.

It is not just an update of 3G or 4G, which are already harmful enough, but a whole

new part of the electromagnetic spectrum, millimetre waves, more powerful than

anything we have seen before.

The human body is an electromagnetic field.

The brain communicates with the rest of the body, and the cells process thoughts,

information, electrically. When this electromagnetic field is in equilibrium, we are

healthy. When in imbalance or disharmony, we feel malaise, we suffer from diseases, which are manifested in the form of what we call physical or psychological diseases.

We are now bombarded 24 hours a day and 7 days a week by electromagnetic fields generated by technology and WiFi. And in this period of restriction justified by this “virus”, we see 5G being installed in more and more places.

Each rise in the level of radiation results in an epidemic.

Doctors and scientists from 41 countries signed a petition calling for a ban on 5G.

The impact of 5G on health has not been studied, otherwise it would never have seen the light of day. 5G satellites are irradiating every square centimetre of the Earth.

Certain people want this to happen because they seek to manipulate humanity. 5G

poisons the cells; they are poisoned by the electromagnetic field. The cells release the exosomes, and they will test you positive for COVID-19.”

Claire Edwards’ approach emphasizes the element of fraud and disinformation, exposing her to reproach from the official spokespersons for European policy. For example:

“Disinformation in the field of health is thriving, including in relation to the new COVID19 Corona virus. It is important to rely only on trustworthy sources to receive correct information on the outbreak of the virus” the Commission, and its president Ursula von der Leyen, stress.

The Commission notes that the EU maintains the world’s highest standards for consumers.

“This is the reason that we can go into a shop and feel sure about the products we buy. For 5G in particular it can be said that these exceptionally high standards are maintained. In reality our standards are much higher than those indicated in the international scientific data – because in the European Union people come first.

As has been made clear, there is no link between 5G and COVIC-19 and the virus cannot be transmitted via mobile telephone networks.

The corona virus spreads from one person to another through droplets when people sneeze, cough or exhale. 5G is the new generation of mobile telephony, transmitted through radio waves. There is no evidence that 5G is harmful to human health.”

Thus spake the Commission.

The task of exposing the disinformation of official sources at a time when they control almost the entirety of the mass media has the appearance of the labours of Sisyphus. It is something that Arthur Firstenberg does not seem even to attempt. Instead of that, in his book “The Invisible Rainbow” he presents a critique so radical that few will be prepared to face its implications, i.e. that the impasse of present-day civilization is a product of the advent of electrification.

Firstenberg reminds us that electricity was seen first as a component of life, of living organisms. It was employed for nearly two centuries in medicine before it began to be exploited intensively for lighting and powering machines. Initially electricity was direct current because alternating current does not exist in nature except in lightning. The Earth’s magnetic field operates with direct current.

“To some degree”, says Firstenberg “all man-made electrical energy is harmful. To some degree the damage can be controlled, for example through shielding around a wire. Of course, as soon as alternating current is introduced , the shielding problem is made more complicated, but not totally. The difference between the dangers of the past and those of wireless technology is that suddenly it is being broadcast deliberately to every square inch of the Earth. That cannot be fixed.”

The first electrical technology to be harnessed outside medicine was telegraphy. Simultaneously with the appearance of telegraphy a new disease began to be reported in the medical literature. It was called “neurasthenia”. Subsequently, 1889 saw the introduction of alternating current. This new form of electricity, almost unknown in nature, was developed by Nicola Tesla and adopted by Westinghouse. 1889 was also the year of the first modern influenza.

In 1918, when the United States entered the First World War, the intensive use of radio technology began in the context of the war effort. According to Firstenberg the flu epidemic which broke out after the war was caused by the sudden change in the Earth’s electromagnetic environment brought about by the world-wide use of radio for the first time.

Firstenberg acknowledges that “the world will not easily accept the idea that influenza is not an infectious disease”. Because the opposite conviction is so deeply rooted in society, the European Commission’s position that the Corona virus – and indeed influenza – “cannot be transmitted via mobile telephone networks” but spreads when people sneeze, cough or exhale” will remain predominant. A hundred years ago, at the time of the Spanish flu of 1918, persistent efforts were made to prove the infectious nature of influenza. Doctors in various universities recruited hundreds of healthy people, brought them into contact with flu patients and tried to infect them. They tried to infect them by collecting secretions and mucus, throat swabbings from very sick people, and had healthy people swallow it. They put it in their eyes, up their nose, they injected them with sick people’s blood. They were totally unable to infect a single healthy person with influenza from sick people. The same thing was tried with horses. They tried to infect healthy horses with secretions from sick horses, and again they failed. The influence of a flu virus is well-established, says Firstenberg, but the relationship between the virus and the disease is open to question. In contrast, the relationship between influenza and electricity is strong.

While the theses of the study “What on earth is going on?”, translated by Claire Edwards, reproduce the viewpoints of people stigmatized as conspiracy theorists, Firstenberg’s positions are more nuanced. He does not dismiss the possibility that that the activists campaigning over climate change might be in the right. He simply believes that the problem of 5g is much more immediate.

“They asked me if I think the Corona disease is caused by 5g and my answer is: not directly. But the parallel with 1918 is impressive. The 1918 flu didn’t start from a virus but from the proliferation of radio technology to such an extent that it transformed the electromagnetic environment of the Earth. The first, milder, wave of influenza in the winter, spring and summer of 1918 waves was caused by the spread of thousands of wireless telegraph stations, each with limited geographic range. The second wave, which lasted three whole years, caused disease in one third of humanity and killed ten percent of those who fell sick. It was caused by the upgrading of radio technology from the telegraph to the radio, from part-time implementation to full-time implementation, acquiring planetary dimensions.”

Arthur Firstenberg interview

RUSSIAN DEFECTION OVER COUNTRY’S RUSHED COVID VACCINE

While making headlines as the first country to register a Covid-19 vaccine, several top Russian health leaders are voicing strong opposition to the shot’s rollout. From the internal defections, it appears the science, ethics and legitimacy of the vaccine are being put into question.

https://thehighwire.com/videos/russian-defection-over-countrys-rushed-covid-vaccine


Comments from W.H.:

1.  Would Western secret services have had a role in these defections? Would Western secret services WANT to have a role in these defections? It seems a ready-made development for generating cognitive dissonance.
2.  Here is some more input on this, strengthening the view that this is about politics more than science. https://www.rt.com/russia/499876-the-lancet-russian-sputnik-vaccine-effectiveness/
3. Note that the Russian defection news item is no longer featured at The Highwire.